Bench:
Mr. Justice Bhishmadev Chakrabortty
Civil Revision No. 4574 of 2014
Amol Chandra Mollik ..... petitioner -Versus-
Odir Mollik alias Mondol..... opposite party No one appears for the petitioner
Mr. FM Mizanur Rahman, Advocate
...... for the opposite party
Judgment on 04.02.2024
Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause as to why the judgment and order dated 12.06.2014 passed by the Joint District Judge, Court No. 2, Khulna in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 53 of 2013 dismissing the appeal and affirming the judgment and order dated 29.04.2013 passed by the Assistant Judge, Dumuria, Khulna in Miscellaneous Case No. 28 of 2004 allowing the case for pre-emption under section 96 of the State Acquision of Tenancy Act (the SAT Act, 1950) should not be set aside.
Opposite party 1 herein as pre-emptor filed the miscellaneous case for pre-emption stating facts that Mahtab Uddin Akunji was the original owner of the suit land. He transferred 1.09 acres of land to the father of the pre-emptor Madhab Chandra by a registered kabala dated 19.02.1963. He further sold .33 acres to the father of opposite parties 2 and 3 Fulchan Mandal and accordingly record was prepared in the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.