SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(BD)(SC) 14020

Bench:

Mr. Justice Bhishmadev Chakrabortty

Civil Revision No. 4574 of 2014

Amol Chandra Mollik ..... petitioner -Versus-

Odir Mollik alias Mondol..... opposite party No one appears for the petitioner

Mr. FM Mizanur Rahman, Advocate

...... for the opposite party

Judgment on 04.02.2024

Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause as to why the judgment and order dated 12.06.2014 passed by the Joint District Judge, Court No. 2, Khulna in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 53 of 2013 dismissing the appeal and affirming the judgment and order dated 29.04.2013 passed by the Assistant Judge, Dumuria, Khulna in Miscellaneous Case No. 28 of 2004 allowing the case for pre-emption under section 96 of the State Acquision of Tenancy Act (the SAT Act, 1950) should not be set aside.

Opposite party 1 herein as pre-emptor filed the miscellaneous case for pre-emption stating facts that Mahtab Uddin Akunji was the original owner of the suit land. He transferred 1.09 acres of land to the father of the pre-emptor Madhab Chandra by a registered kabala dated 19.02.1963. He further sold .33 acres to the father of opposite parties 2 and 3 Fulchan Mandal and accordingly record was prepared in the


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top