SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(BD)(SC) 11896

Present:

Mr. Justice S M Kuddus Zaman CIVIL REVISION NO.2973 of 2022.

Md. Jamshed Ali and others

...Petitioners

-Versus-

Upozilla Health Complex and others

...opposite parties

Mr. Sk. Md. Jalal Uddin, Advocate ...For the petitioners

No one appears

….For the opposite parties

Heard & Judgment on: 27.08.2024.

This Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party Nos.1 and 2 to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and order dated 24.01.2018 passed by the learned District Judge, Kurigram in Civil Revision No.17 of 2016 rejecting the said revision affirming the judgment and order dated 29.03.2016 passed by the learned Senior Assistant Judge, Ulipur, Kurigram rejecting the petition under sections 151 of 152 for correction of plaint and decree of Other Suit No.71 of 2005 should not be set aside and/or pass such other or further order or orders as to this Court may seem fit and proper.

Facts in short are that the petitioner as plaintiff instituted Other Suit No.71 of 2005 for partition seeking a separate saham for

decimal land appertaining to S. A.khatian No.598

of mouza Zonaidanga and J.L. No.105 under Kurigram District and above suit was decreed ex parte i


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top