SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(BD)(SC) 12722

Present

Mr. Justice Md. Salim.

CIVIL REVISION NO.5397 OF 2023

Md. Mojibur Rahman and others

........The defendant-Petitioners.

-VERSUS-

Abul Hossain Majhi and others

.…..The plaintiff-opposite parties.

Mr. Md. Abul Kasem, Advocate

...…... For the petitioners.

Mr. A.K.M. Shamshad, Advocate

........ For the opposite parties.

The 28th, November,2024. By this Rule, the opposite parties were called upon

to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and order dated 24.05.2023 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 2nd Court, Munshiganj in Title Appeal No.140 of 2013, allowing the application under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure for amendment of plaint.

Facts leading to this Rule are that the opposite parties 1-22 as plaintiffs instituted Title Suit 13 of 2011 before the Senior Assistant Judge, Tongibari, Munshiganj, for declaration of title.

Defendants 1-8 contested the suit by filing a joint written statement.

The learned Senior Assistant Judge, Tongibari, Munshiganj, framed necessary issues during the trial.


1

Subsequently, the learned Senior Assistant Judge, Tongibari, Munshiganj, dismissed the suit by judgment and decree d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top