Bench:

Mr. Justice Bhishmadev Chakrabortty Civil Revision No.1093 of 2018

Suraiya Begum and others .....petitioners

-Versus-

Sk. Md. Sahin and others

......opposite parties

Mr.Md. Ekramul Islam, Advocate

...... for the petitioner

Mr. Tapon Kumar Bepary with

Mr. Bulbul Das, Advocates

...... for the opposite parties

Judgment on 16.07.2024

This rule at the instance of the defendants was issued calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Pirojpur passed on 15.03.2018 in Title Appeal No. 37 of 2017 dismissing the appeal affirming the judgment and decree of the Assistant Judge, Nesarabad, Pirojpur passed on 13.06.2017 in Title Suit No. 16 of 2015 decreeing the suit for permanent injunction should not be set aside and/or such other or further order or orders passed to this court may seem fit and proper.

Facts relevant for disposal of the rule, in brief, are that opposite parties herein as plaintiffs instituted the aforesaid suit alleging, inter alia, that SA khatian 1/33 in respect of 14.73 acres of land was prepared in the name of Saleha Khatun and others. During possession and enjoyment of her share meas