SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(BD)(SC) 12091

1

Bench

Mr. Justice Bhishmadev Chakrabortty and

Mr. Justice A.K.M. Zahirul Huq

Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.26419 of 2024

Md. Alamgir .....accused-petitioner

-Versus-

The State ....opposite party

Mr. Md. Golam Azom, Advocate

.... for the petitioner

Mr. Md. Humayun Kabir Monju, Deputy Attorney General

.... for the opposite party

Judgment on 29.08.2024.

Bhishmadev Chakrabortty, J:

In this Rule the opposite party was called upon to show cause as to why the accused-petitioner should not be enlarged on bail in CR No. 1435 of 2023 (Naogaon) under sections 406, 420, 195 and 34 of the Penal Code, 1860 arising out of Patnitala Police Station Case No. 06 dated 03.06.2024 corresponding to GR No. 159 of 2023 (Patnitala) under serial no. 29(Ka) of the table appended to sections 36(1) and 41 of the Madak Drabbya Niyantran Ain, 2018 now pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Naogaon and/or to pass such other or further order or orders to this Court may seem fit and proper.

Mr. Md. Golam Azam, learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the allegation has been brought against the petitioner of creating forge document for releasing a motorcycle seized

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top