SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(BD)(SC) 11774

1

Present:

MR. JUSTICE S.M. EMDADUL HOQUE CIVIL REVISION NO. 426 OF 1991.

IN THE MATTER OF:

An application under section 25 of The Small Causes Courts Act, 1887.

- AND -

IN THE MATTER OF:

M. Sultan Ahmed, being dead his heirs 1(a) Mohammad Rafiqul Islam Sarder and others.

….plaintiff-petitioners.

-Versus –

Md. Mahmudul Anwar and others.

….defendant-opposite parties.

Mr. Manzur-al- Matin, Advocate, with

Mr. Tapos Bhundu Das, Advocate

….. For the petitioners. Mr. Md. Tajul Islam Chowdhury, Advocate

….. For opposite parties.

Heard on: 27.02.2024, 05.03.2024 and Judgment on 06.03.2024. On an application of the petitioners M. Sultan Ahmed, being dead

his heirs 1(a) Mohammad Rafiqul Islam Sarder and others under section 25 of The Small Cause Courts Act, 1887, the Rule was issued calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and decree dated 25.10.1990 passed by the Senior Assistant Judge, Chattogram in S.C.C. Suit No. 38 of 1986 actually the Small Causes 1st Court, Sadar, Chattogram but inadvertently, in the decree, has been mentioned as Senior Assistant Judge, 1st Court, Chattogram dismissing the suit, should not be set as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top