Bench:

Mr. Justice Bhishmadev Chakrabortty

Civil Revision No.867 of 2017

Md. Harun Mridha and others

......petitioners -Versus-

Md. Ali Kha and others

......opposite parties

Mr. Mohammad Eunus, Advocate

...... for the petitioners

Mr. Abdul Barek Chowdhury with

Mr. Nawaj Sharif, Advocates

...... for opposite parties 1-6

Judgment on 04.08.2024

This Rule at the instance of the defendants was issued calling upon the plaintiffs to show cause as to why the judgment and decree of the Special District Judge, Barishal passed on 23.10.2016 in Title Appeal No.19 of 2016 dismissing the same affirming the judgment and decree of the Senior Assistant Judge, Sadar, Barishal passed on 29.11.2015 in Title Suit No.105 of 2008 decreeing the suit for partition should not be set aside and/or such other or further order or orders passed to this Court seem fit and proper.

The plaint case, in brief, is that 18.92 acres of land was recorded correctly in the name of Maheruddin alias Mafizuddin to the extent of 8 annas and Saferuddin and Aminuddin to 4 annas each. Mafizuddin thus got 9.46 acres in his share. He had two wives Barujan and Hamidunnessa. Through registered haba dated

18.0