SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(BD)(SC) 8527

Bench:

Mr. Justice Bhishmadev Chakrabortty

Civil Revision No. 567(con) of 2022

Government of Bangladesh and others

..... petitioners -Versus-

Ahammad Ali and others ..... opposite parties

Ms. Rahima Khatun, Deputy Attorney General

with Mr. Ruhul Amin, Ms. Shahla Sharafat Nazad and Ms. Farida Parvin, Assistant Attorney Generals ..... for the petitioners

Mr. Md. Mesbahul Islam Asif, Advocate

..... for the opposite parties

Judgment on 06.06.2024

Bhishmadev Chakrabortty, J:

This rule was issued calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the delay of 3299 days in filing the revisional application against the judgment and order of the District Judge, Gazipur passed on 16.06.2011 in Title Appeal No. 85 of 2011 dismissing the appeal being barred by limitation should not be condoned and/or such other or further order or orders passed to this Court may seem fit and proper.

Facts relevant for disposal of the rule, in brief, are that opposite parties 1-5 as plaintiffs instituted Title Suit No. 121 of 1999 in the Court of Assistant Judge, Shreepur, Gazipur for declaration of title in the suit land measuring an area of 1.66 acres as described in the schedule to the pliant. I


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top