Present:

Mr. Justice A.K.M. Asaduzzaman

Civil Revision No. 3592 of 2007

Gadu Miah and others

……………Petitioners.

-Versus-

Md. Chan Miah

…….Opposite party.

Mr. Md. Abdul Haque, Advocate

…….For the petitioners.

Mr. Md. Shah Alam Sarker, Advocate

…….. For the opposite party.

Heard and judgment on 20th February, 2024. A.K.M.Asaduzzaman,J.

This rule was issued calling upon the opposite party to show

cause as to why the impugned judgment and decree dated 15.04.2007 passed by the Additional District Judge, 4th Court, Mymensingh in Other Class Appeal No. 258 of 2004 reversing those dated 10.10.2004 passed by the Senior Assistant Judge, Fulbaria, Mymensingh in Other Class Suit No. 12 of 2004 decreeing the suit should not be set aside.

Petitioner as plaintiff filed Other Class Suit No. 12 of 2004 against the opposite parties for cancellation of deed.

Plaint case in short, inter alia, is that suit property is the paternal property of the plaintiff. Osman Ali, Asor Ali and Makrom Ali are three brothers of the plaintif