Present:
Mr. Justice A.K.M. Asaduzzaman
Civil Revision No. 2721 of 2023
Md. Rasel Bhuyan and others
………… Petitioners.
-Versus-
Most. Ayesha Akter Minu and others
………….Opposite parties. Mr. Md. Rafiqul Islam Faruque, Adv.
.........For the petitioners.
Mr. Md. Abdullah Al Mamun, Advocate …….. For the Opposite Parties
Heard and judgment on 27th November, 2023. A.K.M.Asaduzzaman,J.
This rule was issued calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the judgment and order dated 31.05.2023 passed by the District Judge, Munshigonj in Miscellaneous Appeal No.24 of 2023 staying the order of status-quo dated 30.04.2023 passed by the Senior Assistant Judge, Sadar Court, Munshigonj in Title Suit No. 414 of 2021 allowing the application
1
for temporary injunction of the defendant Nos. 37-39 under Order 39 rule 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Fact relevant for disposal of the rule are that opposite party Nos. 4-5 as plaintiff instituted Title Suit No. 414 of 2021 against the petitioner and opposite party Nos. 1-3 and proforma opposite parties for declaration of title and partition.
During pendency of the suit on 09.04.2023 defendant Nos. 37-39 filed an application
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.