SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(BD)(SC) 1009

District: Cumilla

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH

HIGH COURT DIVISION

(CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION)

Present

Mr. Justice Sardar Md. Rashed Jahangir

Civil Revision No. 1159 of 2023

In the matter of :

Afia Khatun and others

… Petitioners

-Versus-

Amena Begum and others

…Opposite parties

Mr. Muhammad Rafiul Islam, Advocate

…For the petitioners

Mr. Prahlad Debnath, Advocate

…For the opposite party No. 1

Heard on: 14.11.2024 and 27.11.2024 Judgment on: 04.12.2024

Rule was issued on an application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the judgment and order dated 30.01.2023 passed by the Additional District Judge, Forth Court, Cumilla in Civil Appeal No.130 of 2020 arising out of Title Suit No.99 of 2017, allowing the application to examine additional witnesses,


1

should not be set aside and/or such other or further order or orders as to this Court may seem fit and proper.

The present opposite party No.1 as plaintiff filed Title Suit No.99 of 2017 before the Assistant Judge, Borura, Cumilla for declaration of title in respect of the scheduled property to the plaint. On conclusion of hearing the suit w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top