SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(BD)(SC) 1017

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION

(CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION)

Present:

Mr. Justice S M Kuddus Zaman

CIVIL REVISION NO.1633 OF 2002

In the matter of:

An application under Section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

And

Md. Habib Ullah

... Petitioner

-Versus-

San Ullah and others

... Opposite parties

None appears

… For both the parties.

Heard and Judgment on 25.11.2024.

On an application under Section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure this Rule was issued calling upon the opposite party No.1 to to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and decree dated 19.11.2001 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, 1st Court, Sylhet in Title Appeal No.119 of 1997 reversing the judgment and decree dated 28.04.1997 passed by the learned Senior Assistant Judge, Balagonj, Sylhet in Title Suit No.09 of 1996 should not be set aside should not be set aside and or pass such other or further order or orders as to this Court may seem fit and proper.

Facts in short are that the petitioner as plaintiff instituted above suit for a decree for perpetual injunction for 1.75 acre land alleging that that above property belonged to Isma


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top