SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(BD)(SC) 993

1

Present:

Mr. Justice Md. Shohrowardi

Criminal Revision No. 1908 of 2023 Tanjina

...Convict-petitioner -Versus-

The State and another

...Opposite parties

Mr. Ehsanul Hoque, Advocate

...For the convict-petitioner

Mr. Shahin Alam, Advocate

...For the complainant-opposite party No. 2 Heard on 06.11.2024 and 21.11.2024

Judgment delivered on 26.11.2024

On an application filed under Section 439 read with Section 435 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 Rule was issued calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and order dated 23.02.2023 passed by Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Court No. 11, Dhaka in Criminal Appeal No. 977 of 2022 affirming the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 10.03.2015 passed by Joint Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Court No. 5, Dhaka in Metropolitan Sessions Case No. 4254 of 2014 arising out of C.R. Case No. 661 of 2013 convicting the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and sentencing her to suffer imprisonment for 1(one) year and fine of Tk. 10,00,000 should not be set aside and/or such other or further order or orders passed as t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top