1
Present:
Mr. Justice Md. Shohrowardi
Criminal Revision No. 1908 of 2023 Tanjina
...Convict-petitioner -Versus-
The State and another
...Opposite parties
Mr. Ehsanul Hoque, Advocate
...For the convict-petitioner
Mr. Shahin Alam, Advocate
...For the complainant-opposite party No. 2 Heard on 06.11.2024 and 21.11.2024
Judgment delivered on 26.11.2024
On an application filed under Section 439 read with Section 435 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 Rule was issued calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and order dated 23.02.2023 passed by Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Court No. 11, Dhaka in Criminal Appeal No. 977 of 2022 affirming the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 10.03.2015 passed by Joint Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Court No. 5, Dhaka in Metropolitan Sessions Case No. 4254 of 2014 arising out of C.R. Case No. 661 of 2013 convicting the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and sentencing her to suffer imprisonment for 1(one) year and fine of Tk. 10,00,000 should not be set aside and/or such other or further order or orders passed as t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.