CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
GURDEEP SINGHVSM/O RAILWAYS
O.A./282/2016
1
Item No. 26/C-III
O.A. No. 282/2016
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PRINCIPAL BENCH: NEW DELHI
O.A. No. 282/2016
This the 20th day of January, 2023
Hon’ble Mr. Ashish Kalia, Member (J)
Hon’ble Dr. Anand S Khati, Member (A)
Shri Gurdeep Singh
S/o Shri Jang Singh
Sr Ticket Examiner
Ferozpur Division
Northern Railway
Railway Station Ludhiana
…Applicant
(By Advocate : Ms. Meenu Mainee)
Versus
1. General Manageer
South Eastern Railway, Calcutta
2. General Manager
Northern Railway
Baroda House, New Delhi
3. Divisional Railway Manager
Northern Railway
Ferozpur Cantt.
….Respondents
(By Advocate : Ms. Dharam Deshna)
2
Item No. 26/C-III
O.A. No. 282/2016
ORDER (ORAL)
Hon’ble Mr. Ashish Kalia, Member (J)
By virtue of the present OA, the applicants are seeking the
following reliefs:
“8.1 That the Hon'ble Tribunal may be graciously pleased to allow
this application and direct the respondents to release two out of
turn promotions to the applicant from the date these promotions
were due with all consequential benefits like arrears, seniority
etc.
8.2 That the Hon'ble Tribunal may further be pleased to direct
the respondents to release additional increments as due to the
applicant as per para 9.4.1. and 9.4.2 of the aforesaid circular
from the date such increments were due with all consequential
benefits like arrears etc.
8.3 That the Hon'ble Tribunal may also be graciously pleased to
give the benefit of additional increments to the applicant as per
para 9.2 of Railway Board circular.
8.4 That the Hon'ble Tribunal may be pleased to direct the
respondents to pay all consequential benefits, including arrears.
8.2 That the Hon'ble Tribunal may further graciously be pleased
to pass any, other or further order as may be deemed fit and
proper on the facts and circumstances of the case.
8.3 That the Hon'ble Tribunal may further be graciously pleased
to grant costs against the respondents and in favour of the
applicant.”
2. The applicant was appointed as a Ticket Collector against
sports quota and he was transferred from South Eastern
Railway to Northern Railway on mutual request basis. As per
the Railway Board circular dated 20.06.2006, some extra and
additional benefits have been provided by the Railway Board to
3
Item No. 26/C-III
O.A. No. 282/2016
sport persons like out of turn promotion additional increment
etc., which was not given to the applicant.
3. The applicant made a detailed representation to the
respondents on 28.09.2014 which is stated to have been
rejected by the impugned order dated 01.12.2015.
4. Notices were issued to the respondents. They put
appearance and filed reply. It is submitted that the OA is not
maintainable at Principal Bench as admittedly, the applicant is
posted in Ludhiana.
5. The first objection raised is for territorial jurisdiction. The
present OA is also not maintainable for non-joinder of
necessary parties in as much as the applicant has not
impleaded any person who is adversely affected in case the
relief is granted. Further, the OA is premature, the applicant
has not addressed the representation to the South Eastern
Railway. It is stated that the applicant was selected as Ticket
Examiner in South Eastern Railway in the pay-scale of Rs.
3050-4590 on 5.4.2007 against sport quota. It is further
submitted that applicant was promoted on 01.12.2015 as per
his seniority. He is not entitled for out of turn promotion as per
the policy of Railway Board as the applicant has not got three
4
Item No. 26/C-III