CUSTOMS EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
ANIL CHOUDHARY MEMBER(JUDICIAL)
DHARMESH B BHAVSAR – Appellant
Versus
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER, CUSTOMS-JAIPUR I – Respondent
C/51095/2020
1
Customs Appeal No. 51095 of 2020-SM
CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
NEW DELHI.
PRINCIPAL BENCH - COURT NO. II
Customs Appeal No. 51095 of 2020-SM
(Arising out of order-in-appeal No. 13 to 15 (SM) CUS/ JPR/2020 dated 24/26.02.2020
passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise & CGST, Jaipur).
Dharmesh B. Bhavsar
Appellant
1469, Manivasan Sheri, Saraspur
Ahmedabad.
VERSUS
Principal Commissioner, Customs
Respondent
C. R. Building, Statue Circle,
C-Scheme, Jaipur.
APPEARANCE:
Sh. N. K. Tiwari, Consultant for the appellant
Sh. Ishwar Charan, Authorised Representative for the respondent
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. ANIL CHOUDHARY, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)
FINAL ORDER NO. 50045/2023
DATE OF HEARING: 31.08.2022
DATE OF DECISION: 17.01.2023
ANIL CHOUDHARY:
The appellant, Dharmesh B. Bhavsar is a trader engaged in
trading of electronic goods including mobile phones. He purchases the
goods from local market in India for trading.
2.
In the month of July, goods loaded on truck No. RJ14 GE
3145 comprising goods under various consignment notes (of various
parties) were loaded from Delhi for being transported to Ahmedabad,
was intercepted by Sales Tax Department at Jaipur in the month of July,
2014 (night of 1st and 2nd July). It appeared to the officers of
2
Customs Appeal No. 51095 of 2020-SM
Commercial Tax Department that several goods inter alia electronic
goods, namely LCD, LED TV and Chinese made mobile phones,
alongwith other parchooni goods were being transported without proper
invoice/ challan or documents. The Sales Tax Officer detained the
vehicle and the goods and after taking the custody got the truck parked
at High Court circle, at Jaipur. The sales Tax Officers assessed the
goods to Sales Tax pursuant to enquiry and recording of statement(s)
holding that the goods have been purchased and sold within India (in
the State of Rajasthan) and accordingly assessed sales tax liability and
penalty, which was deposited by the transporter. In the meantime, the
Sales Tax Department had informed the Customs Department, that as
the goods appears to be imported, they may also make enquiry. That
immediately when the goods was released by the Customs Department
after payment of tax and penalty on 01.08.2014, the Customs Officers
at the gate of Sales Tax Department, intercepted the truck and detained
the goods and the truck and brought to their office. Thereafter, after
making enquiries the Customs Department issued show cause notice dt.
28.01.2015. In the show cause notice, it is mentioned that the Customs
Department have intercepted the truck and the goods on 01.08.2014
itself on release by the Sales Tax Department and detained the goods
under Section 110(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 under detention memo
dt . 01.08.2014. The Customs Department recorded the statement of
(i) Sh. Suresh Chand Gurjar, Truck Driver, and (ii) Sh. Kamlesh G.
Chandwani, Partner of M/s Sri Vishal Gujrat Freight Cargo (Sri VGFC in
short). The Customs Department also received letter dt. 17.09.2014
from Sh. Bhavesh Parnami, Ahmedabad wherein he submitted that the
3
Customs Appeal No. 51095 of 2020-SM
goods – 20 LED TV was booked via Sri VGFC for transportation to
Ahmedabad. He has purchased the LED TV under Tax Invoice No. 230
dt. 01.07.2014 from M/s Gomti Impex, Civil Lines, Delhi and one LED
from M/s S. K. Trading Company, Delhi. He also annexed the copy of
invoice for purchase of 19 LED TVs. Statement of Sh. Bhavesh Parnami
was recorded on 03.11.2014.
3.
Another letter was received from Sh. Jagdish Bhai alias
Nilesh Bhai dt. 17.09.2014 by the Customs that he has booked 16 LED
TVs for transport from Delhi to Ahmedabad with Sri VGFC, this he has
purchased under Tax Invoice dt. 01.07.2014 from M/s S. K. Trading
Company, Delhi.
4.
Further statement of Sh. Kamlesh G. Chandwani, Partner of
Sri VGFC was recorded on 03.11.2014, wherein he inter alia