SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HK)(HKCFA) 9

Press Summary (English)

Press Summary (Chinese)

FACV Nos 7, 8 & 9 of 2024

[2025] HKCFA 6

FACV No. 7 of 2024

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

FINAL APPEAL NO. 7 OF 2024 (CIVIL)

(ON APPEAL FROM CACV NO. 184 OF 2023)

________________________

BETWEEN
NUOXI CAPITAL LIMITED Plaintiff (Respondent)
(諾熙資本有限公司)
(IN LIQUIDATION IN THE BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS)
and
PEKING UNIVERSITY FOUNDER GROUP COMPANY LIMITED Defendant (Appellant)
(北大方正集團有限公司)

________________________

FACV No. 8 of 2024

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

FINAL APPEAL NO. 8 OF 2024 (CIVIL)

(ON APPEAL FROM CACV NO. 185 OF 2023)

BETWEEN
HONGKONG JHC CO., LIMITED Plaintiff
(Respondent)
(香港京慧誠有限公司)
(IN LIQUIDATION)
and
PEKING UNIVERSITY FOUNDER GROUP COMPANY LIMITED Defendant
(Appellant)
(北大方正集團有限公司)

________________________

FACV No. 9 of 2024

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

FINAL APPEAL NO. 9 OF 2024 (CIVIL)

(ON APPEAL FROM CACV NO. 186 OF 2023)

BETWEEN
KUNZHI LIMITED Plaintiff
(Respondent)
(坤智有限公司)
(IN LIQUIDATION IN THE BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS)
and
PEKING UNIVERSITY FOUNDER GROUP COMPANY LIMITED Defendant
(Appellant)
(北大方正集團有限公司)

(Heard together)

Before: Chief Justice Cheung, Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ, Mr Justice Fok PJ, Mr Justice Lam PJ and Mr Justice Allsop NPJ
Date of Hearing: 10 February 2025
Date of Judgment: 19 March 2025

________________________

J U D G M E N T

________________________

Chief Justice Cheung:

1. I agree with the judgment of Mr Justice Allsop NPJ.

Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ:

2. I agree with the judgment of Mr Justice Allsop NPJ.

Mr Justice Fok PJ:

3. I agree with the judgment of Mr Justice Allsop NPJ.

Mr Justice Lam PJ:

4. I agree with the judgment of Mr Justice Allsop NPJ.

Mr Justice Allsop NPJ:

Introduction and the issue

5. The three appeals before the Court that were heard together arise from the failure of a commercial group of companies of which the Appellant, the Peking University Founder Group Company Limited ( PUFG or the Company ) is the ultimate parent. PUFG, a Mainland company, is now under re-organisation by Administrators pursuant to an order made by the Beijing No 1 Intermediate Pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top