SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HK)(HKCT) 1

CTEA 2/2022 and CTEA 2/2023

(HEARD TOGETHER)

[2025] HKCT 3

CTEA 2/2022

IN THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL ENFORCEMENT ACTION NO 2 OF 2022

____________________

BETWEEN

COMPETITION COMMISSION Applicant
and
ATAL BUILDING SERVICES ENGINEERING LIMITED 1 st Respondent
ANALOGUE HOLDINGS LIMITED 2 nd Respondent
SHUN HING ENGINEERING CONTRACTING COMPANY LIMITED 3 rd Respondent
SHUN HING HOLDINGS COMPANY LIMITED 4 th Respondent
SER KA WAI 5 th Respondent
CHENG KIT SHUN 6 th Respondent
KWAN SIU KIN 7 th Respondent

____________________

AND CTEA 2/2023

IN THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL ENFORCEMENT ACTION NO 2 OF 2023

____________________

BETWEEN

COMPETITION COMMISSION Applicant
and
ATAL BUILDING SERVICES ENGINEERING LIMITED 1 st Respondent
JOHNSON CONTROLS HONG KONG LIMITED 2 nd Respondent
YORK INTERNATIONAL (NORTHERN ASIA) LIMITED 3 rd Respondent
JOHNSON CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL PLC 4 th Respondent
LEE YUI MING 5 th Respondent

____________________

(HEARD TOGETHER)

Before: Hon Harris J, President of the Competition Tribunal in Chambers
Date of Hearing: 6 June 2024
Date of Decision: 6 June 2024
Date of Reasons for Decision: 25 March 2025

_________________________________

REASONS FOR DECISION

_________________________________

1. On 6 June 2024 I heard at the same time case management conferences in CTEA 2/2022 and CTEA 2/2023. The reason they were heard together was because the Commission had listed a summons in each proceeding that they be consolidated. I indicated at the outset of the hearing that I would not make such an order, although I had no objection (and neither did the Respondents in the two proceedings) to them being heard one after the other. As can be seen from the titles to the two proceedings they have one common party. They both concern alleged contraventions of the First Conduct Rule (“ FCR ”) in connection with tendering for air-conditioning maintenance, installation, repair or replacement works. There is little overlap between the facts other than for the business activity, which is the subject of




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top