SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HK)(HKDC) 92

DCCJ 2733/2021

[2025] HKDC 1001

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CIVIL ACTION NO 2733 OF 2021

----------------------------------

BETWEEN

CHEUNG TAK MAN DESMOND 1 st Plaintiff
CHIU SZE WAI WILFRED 2 nd Plaintiff
and
IP PUI LAM ARTHUR and IP PUI SUM
(the Former Joint and Several Trustees in
Bankruptcy of the Estate of HO YUK WAH DAVID (a bankrupt))
1 st Defendant
CHEN YUNG NGAI KENNETH and
CHAN MEI MEI (the Joint and Several Trustees in
Bankruptcy of the Estate of HO YUK WAH DAVID (a bankrupt))
2 nd Defendant
LAM SIU SUN DENNIS 3 rd Defendant
LEE MOSES 4 th Defendant

----------------------------------

Before: Deputy District Judge Walker Sham in court
Dates of Hearing: 10 to 14, 17 February & 20 March 2025
Date of Judgment: 26 June 2025

---------------------------

JUDGMENT

---------------------------

Ps’ claim

1. This is the 1 st and 2 nd Plaintiffs’ (“Ps”) claim for the outstanding legal fees of HK$2,196,478.52, and taxation fee of HK$48,100.00, totaling HK$2,244,578.52 owed by the 1 st Defendant (“D1”) to the firm Li, Wong, Lam & W I Cheung (“LWLWIC”) (now ceased practice).

The parties

2. The former partners of LWLWIC include the 1 st Plaintiff (“P1”), the 2 nd Plaintiff (from 1 September 2016 to 15 February 2019) (“P2”), the 3 rd Defendant (“D3”) and the 4 th Defendant (“D4”).

3. D1 were the joint and several trustees in bankruptcy of the estate (“the Estate”) of Ho Yuk Wah, David (“the Bankrupt”) from 2 August 2011 until D1 resigned on 9 January 2020. D1 retained LWLWIC for the provision of legal services relating to the investigation and proceedings for recovery of assets of the Estate. D3 was the handling partner of the case.

4. The claim against the 2 nd Defendant was discontinued by consent on 19 November 2021.

The dispute

5. LWLWIC issued a Revised Bill dated 6 December 2016 (“the Revised Bill”) to D1 for a sum of HK$5,634,080.06. D1, D3, and D4 (“Ds”) say that the Revised Bill was and is not due and payable because there was an arrangement (“Agreed Fee Arrangement”) made by D3, the creditors of the Bankrupt and D1, whereby any bills issued by LWLWIC would only be due and payable upon conclusion of recovery/litigation actions for the Estate. The recovery/litigation actions are ongoing and, hence, Ps are not entitled to demand the outstanding sum from the Revised Bill. Ps say that the Revised Bill was immediately due and payable and that they are entitled to be paid the remaining sum of HK$2,244,578.52 fr


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top