SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HK)(HKDC) 102

DCCC 289/2024

[2025] HKDC 1291

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CRIMINAL CASE NO 289 OF 2024

------------------

HKSAR
v
SRI MUSRIAH

------------------

Before: Deputy District Judge Casewell
Date: 25 July 2025
Present: Ms Chung Wing Sze, Natalie, Public Prosecutor of the Department of Justice, for HKSAR
Mr Peter Pannu, instructed by Yip, Tse & Tang, assigned by DLA, for the defendant
Offence: [1] Trafficking in dangerous drugs(販運危險藥物)

-------------------------------------

REASONS FOR SENTENCE

-------------------------------------

1. The defendant has pleaded guilty to one charge of trafficking in dangerous drugs in respect of the seizure of various drugs in a flat in Sha Po Old Village on Lamma Island. The drugs concerned were 10.59 grammes of cocaine, 41.36 grammes of herbal cannabis, a further 3.25 grammes of, what we describe as THC. There were also some traces only of methamphetamine found on a solid and in some fluid found in the flat.

2. The facts are very straightforward. The defendant is resident in the premises at Sha Po Old Village in Lamma Island together with another lady. Police entered the premises and seized the drugs set out in the Admitted Facts within the premises in various locations. The defendant was subsequently interviewed and she admitted that she was a resident in the premises and she was in fact looking after the drugs which been placed there by another male. She was aware of the presence of the drugs in the flat. She had on one occasion, she said, delivered some drugs to another person. There were some apparatus for the weighing of drugs in the premises. The defendant herself admits that she is currently a Form 8 holder in Hong Kong.

3. As far as her backgrounds concerned, she is an Indonesian of 37 years old. She had come to Hong Kong as a domestic helper and worked until 2020 and she is a Form 8 recognisance holder in Hong Kong now. She is in fact of clear record in Hong Kong although she has been detained in the past on immigration matters.

4. As far as the approach to the sentence is concerned, the calculation of sentences in these cases are governed largely by guidelines and also by the case of HKSAR v Herry Jane Yuseph which can be found at [2021] 1 HKLRD 290. Also the calculation of the tariffs can be seen from the most recent case of HKSAR v Huang Ruifang [2025] HKCU 940. I do not propose to go into great detail on these matters as they are fairly straightforward in this case.

5. The first step of course in sentencing in a case such as this is to look at the tariff or the appropriate tariff in respect of the drugs that have been seized. In respect of the cocaine, we have got a total of 10.95 grammes which puts it in the band of 10 to 50 grammes cocaine which with the starting point of sentencing between 5 to 8 years’ imprisonment and here the sentence will lie at the bottom end of that band of 5 years’ imprisonment.

6. The cannabis that was found in herbal form and in the form of THC is also governed by a guideline. I do not propose to go into any details as to how that calculation is made but the overall starting point for sentence in respect of the cannabis that has been found in the pre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top