Deputy High Court Judge Yuen in Chambers (not open to the public)
Date of Hearing:
27 August 2024
Date of Judgment:
5 September 2024
______________
J U D G M E N T
______________
DHCJ Yuen:
1.
This is an application by the applicant whom I shall call GG (
Applicant
) to set aside a statutory demand (
SD
) issued by the respondent whom I shall call LL Ltd (
Lender
). It arises out of the following matters.
Background
Loan Agreement
2.1
. On 21 December 2022, a Loan Agreement was signed between the Lender, a company as borrower (
Borrower
), and two individuals including the Applicant as guarantors.
2.2
. Under the Loan Agreement, the Lender agreed to lend $120 million to the Borrower for a period of 24 months at 17.5% p.a. interest, guaranteed by the two guarantors.
2.3
. The loan was also secured by Second Mortgages on three properties owned by companies (
mortgagor companies
) which were not parties to the Loan Agreement. The mortgagor companies are wholly legally and beneficially owned by a company I shall call RR Co Ltd (
RR
) which is in turn wholly legally and beneficially owned by the Applicant
. In this Judgment, I shall use the term “
third party-owned security
” to mean security owned by a party which is not the recipient of the SD.
Fee Letter
3.1
. On the same day as the Loan Agreement, a Fee Letter was signed between the Borrower and a company I shall call KK Ltd as introducer (
Introducer
). Under the Fee Letter, the Borrower agreed to pay the Introducer an introducer fee in an amount equal to 9% of $120 million ($10.8 million) upon drawdown of the loan under the Loan Agreement.
3.2
. It was provided in the Fee Letter that:
- any amount due and payable under the terms of the Fee Letter shall be an amount payable under the Loan Agreement
;
- if the Borrower fails to pay any sum payable under the Fee Letter on the drawdown date in accordance with the Loan Agreement, interest equivalent to 35% p.a. shall accrue on the overdue sum from due date to date of receipt
.
3.3
. The Fee Letter was signed on behalf of the Introducer by a person I shall call
PP
, who was described as its executive director.
3.4
. The sum of $120 million was drawndown on the date of the Loan Agreement.
3.5
. On the same day, the Borrower paid the sum of $10.8 million to the Introducer by cheque. A copy of the cheque was signed by a person I shall call
WW
who had also signed the Loan Agreement on behalf of the Lender as “the authorized representati