SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(HK)(HKDC) 9

DCCC 168/2024

[2024] HKDC 1292

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

CRIMINAL CASE NO. 168 OF 2024

________________________

HKSAR
v
PUN Cham-tung

________________________

Before: H.H. Judge G. Lam
Date: 5 August 2024
Present: Mr. Brian Cheng, PP, of the Department of Justice, for HKSAR.
Mr. Samson Hung instructed by M/s Chow Wong & Lawyers, assigned by the Director of Legal Aid, for the defendant.
Offences: (1) Threatened publication of intimate images without consent(未經同意下威脅發布私密影像)
(2) to (6) Publication of intimate images without consent(未經同意下發布私密影像)

________________________

REASONS FOR SENTENCE

________________________

The defendant pleaded guilty to a charge of "Threatened publication of intimate images without consent" (Charge 1)  and 5 charges of "Publication of intimate images without consent" (Charges 2 to 6). The victim, Miss X, was his ex-girlfriend.

Summary of Facts

2. The defendant and X met in 2019 when they were attending the same secondary school.  They began their courtship in early 2021.  In early May 2023, X broke up with the defendant; however, they maintained contact as friends.

3. On 3 June 2023, X stopped replying to the defendant's messages which were sent to X's various social media platforms.

Charge 1

4. About midnight on 5 June 2023, X received text messages from the defendant via WhatsApp.  He demanded X to reconcile with him; or otherwise her sex video clips would be published on Instagram.  The defendant's text messages included "Do you believe I would post your naked photos on Instagram?" ; "I would post these 2 video clips first and the 3 rd one would show your face" ; and "I will send those to your teachers" .

Charge 2

5. About 5:50 a.m. on 5 June 2023, X received 7 video clips and 3 photos from the defendant via WhatsApp.  Three clips depicted sexual intercourse between X and the defendant; 2 depicted X's private parts; and 2 depicted X and the defendant masturbating.  One photo depicted X's private parts; and the other 2 were screen captures of the defendant having sent X's sex video clips to 2 of his contacts on the same day via WhatsApp coupled with text messages "Brother, are these good?" and "Am I large?" .

Charge 3

6. About 5:14 a.m. on 5 June 2023, Miss Y, a common friend of X and the defendant, received a video clip via Instagram sent from an account named "ck2.3.j".  The clip depicted X and the defendant engaging in sexual intercourse.  Y showed X the clip.  X confirmed that the clip depicted her and the defendant; and she did not consent to its publication.

Charge 4

7. About 5:41 a.m. on 5 June 2023, Y received 3 video clips and 3 photos via Instagram sent from an account named "ck23chicken".  One clip depicted X and the defendant engaging in sexual intercourse; and the other 2 depicted X's private parts.  One photo depicted X's private parts; and the other 2 depicted X's feet.  Y showed X those clips and photos.  X confirmed that the clips depicted her and the defendant;



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top