SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(HK)(HKCFI) 224

HCA 749/2022

[2024] HKCFI 2099

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO. 749 OF 2022

_____________

BETWEEN
MANTRA DAO INC. 1st Plaintiff
RIODEFI INC. 2nd Plaintiff
and
JOHN PATRICK MULLIN 1st Defendant
WILLIAM DONOVAN JOHN CORKIN 2nd Defendant
RODRIGO QUAN MIRANDA 3rd Defendant
JAYANT B RAMANAND 4th Defendant
MD LABS LIMITED 5th Defendant
TRITAURIAN CONSULTING LIMITED 6th Defendant

_____________

Before: Hon Lok J in Chambers
Date of Hearing: 25 April 2023
Date of Decision: 25 April 2023
Date of Reasons for Decision: 12 August 2024

________________________

REASONS FOR DECISION

________________________

1. This is the Plaintiffs’ injunction summons dated 29 August 2022 as amended on 17 February 2023 (“the Summons”). In the substantive hearing on 25 April 2023, I made an order, inter alia , requiring the 1 st to 4 th Defendants to provide: (i) the Plaintiffs with the financial spreadsheets of the MANTRA DAO project (“the Project”) in a certain format from 1 January 2021 onwards; (ii) no more than 3 of the Plaintiffs’ legal and financial advisers with the supporting documents for each of the entries in the said financial spreadsheets subject to written undertakings given by them not to disclose the said documents to the Plaintiffs or any other parties without the order of the court. I now give my reasons.

Background of the dispute and the present application

2. The present action is a dispute as to the true ownership, management and control of the Project, a “decentralised autonomous organisation” (“DAO”) finance platform project in the cryptocurrency industry. The Project involves the use of novel “blockchain” and “cryptoasset” technologies for the purpose of carrying out “Decentralised Finance” activities.

3. The Plaintiffs claim that the Project belongs to, and should ultimately be controlled and managed by, the Plaintiffs. The Plaintiffs initially conceived and set up the Project, including conceiving the idea of a DAO project, designing its main components, locating and securing the initial investors and purchasing its website and email domain names.

4. The 2 nd Plaintiff (“RioDeFi”) is a company incorporated in Malaysia in November 2019 specialising in blockchain technology. RioDeFi’s shareholders and directors include Ng Kian Ming (“Calvin”), James Alan Anderson (“James”) and Stéphane Laurent (“Stephane”). Since its incorporation, RioDeFi has founded and established various blockchain projects, and developed its own technologies and products. According to the Plaintiffs, it had always been the intention that the different projects in the RioDeFi ecosystem could complement each other and be integrated as one group with a spectrum of different services and products, with the view that eventually all the projects will leverage off each other and form a unique and holistic offering in the market. RioDeFi’s bu




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top