ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
DAYA RAM AND 3 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND 3 OTHERS – Respondent
Court No. - 39
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 131 of 2023
Appellant :- Daya Ram And 3 Others
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Counsel for Appellant :- Satya Prakash Singh,Akash Tomar,Shivam Yadav
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Siddharth Khare
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J.
Heard Sri Shivam Yadav, learned Advocate for the appellant and
Sri Parashar Pandey, learned counsel appearing for Respondents 3
and 4. Learned Standing Counsel appears for the State
Respondents.
This intra-court appeal is directed against the interim order dated
10.02.2023, whereby the order dated 10.11.2022 passed by Deputy
Registrar, Firms, Chits and Societies, Meerut, namely, Respondent
no.2 herein, has been stayed along with the consequential order
dated 23.11.2022. It is argued by learned counsel for the appellant
that practically, no reasons have been assigned by the learned
Single Judge in staying the order dated 10.11.2022 passed by the
Deputy Registrar, whereby the list of members of General Body of
the Society had been held invalid on account of absence of
evidence of induction of 31 members in the General Body of the
Society. It is submitted before us
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.