SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 19397

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
DAYA RAM AND 3 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND 3 OTHERS – Respondent


Court No. - 39

Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 131 of 2023

Appellant :- Daya Ram And 3 Others

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others

Counsel for Appellant :- Satya Prakash Singh,Akash Tomar,Shivam Yadav

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Siddharth Khare

Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.

Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J.

Heard Sri Shivam Yadav, learned Advocate for the appellant and

Sri Parashar Pandey, learned counsel appearing for Respondents 3

and 4. Learned Standing Counsel appears for the State

Respondents.

This intra-court appeal is directed against the interim order dated

10.02.2023, whereby the order dated 10.11.2022 passed by Deputy

Registrar, Firms, Chits and Societies, Meerut, namely, Respondent

no.2 herein, has been stayed along with the consequential order

dated 23.11.2022. It is argued by learned counsel for the appellant

that practically, no reasons have been assigned by the learned

Single Judge in staying the order dated 10.11.2022 passed by the

Deputy Registrar, whereby the list of members of General Body of

the Society had been held invalid on account of absence of

evidence of induction of 31 members in the General Body of the

Society. It is submitted before us

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top