Court No. - 88

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5389 of 2022

Revisionist :- Smt. Soniya Agarwal

Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others

Counsel for Revisionist :- Ankit Agarval

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Krishna Kumar Yadav

Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State. None

has appeared on behalf of opposite party Nos. 2 to 4 despite taking case in revised

list.

2. The present criminal revision has been preferred against the order dated

18.05.2022, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.5,

Bulandshahar, in Criminal Appeal No. 145 of 2021 (Pramesh Kumar Mittal and

two others vs. State of U.P. and another), whereby the appeal was allowed and the

order dated 28.09.2021 passed by the trial court in Complaint Case No. 172 of 2020

(Smt. Soniya Agarwal vs. Pramesh Kumar Mittal and others), under Section 12 of

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred as D

V Act), P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District Bulandshahar, was set aside, holding that the

Trial Court has no territorial jurisdiction to try the case in question.

3. It has been argued by learned cou