SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 3804

A.F.R.

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:35758 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6145 of 2021 Petitioner :- Rajendra Singh Respondent :- The State Of U P And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shri Ram Pandey,Kapil Kumar,Kuldeep Saxena,Pradeep Kumar Pandey,Vijit Saxena,Yogendra Singh Bohra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pradeep Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.

1. Heard Sri Y.S. Bohra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Pradeep Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for respondent No.4 and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

2. Petitioner before this Court is aggrieved by the order dated 31.12.2020 whereby the Regional Joint Director of Education recalled the earlier regularisation order granted to the petitioner on 12.12.1995 under Section 33-B of the UP Secondary Education Service Commission Act, 1982 (for short, "Commission Act, 1982").

3. Twin arguments have been advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner: (a) once the regional selection Committee had accorded regularisation to the petitioner under its resolution /decision dated 12.12.1995, the Regional Joint Director of Education (I) Region Meerut himself was not authorised to recall such regularisation or

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top