SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 16797

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
MOHAMMAD IQBAL – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 66

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 29357 of 2022

Applicant :- Mohammad Iqbal

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Avinash Pandey

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Narendra Kumar Tiwari

Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.

Heard Mr. Avinash Pandey, the learned counsel for applicant,

the learned A.G.A. for State and Mr. Yashonidhi Shukla,

Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Narendra Kumar Tiwari, the

learned counsel for opposite party No.3.

Perused the record.

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed

challenging the Charge-sheet dated 03.02.2018 submitted in

Case Crime No.11 of 2018, under Section 135 Electricity Act,

Police Station- Kotwali Nagar, District- Saharanpur and

Cognizance Taking order dated 06.04.2018 passed by

Special/Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.4 Saharanpur in

Special Case No.309 of 2018 (State Vs. Mohammad Iqbal)

under Section 135 Electricity Act, Police Station- Kotwali

Nagar, District- Saharanpur, now pending in the Court of

Additional Sessions Judge, Court No.4, Saharanpur.

It has been stated that the offence alleged is compoundable. The

applicant is ready to settle th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top