Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. None has appeared on behalf of opposite party no.2 despite service of notice.

2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C . has been preferred against the order dated 06.06.2024, passed by learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court No.4, Agra, in Criminal Case No.183 of 2022 (Poonam Daksh Vs. Alok Daksh), under Section 125 Cr.P.C ., Police Station- Fatehabad Hall, District- Agra, whereby the application filed by the applicant for summoning the call detail record of the mobile phone numbers of opposite party no.2 has been rejected.

3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the aforesaid proceedings under Section 125 Cr.P.C . were initiated by opposite party no.2 against applicant. The applicant has filed application before the Family Court stating that in the application under Section 125 Cr.P.C . the opposite party no.2 has made false averment that her brother has left her on 18.12.2021 at the house of applicant and on 01.12.2022 she was assaulted there. It was submitted that the said averments were false and the same can very well be proved by the ca