SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 2717

HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD (LUCKNOW BENCH)
Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. and Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
Arshad Husain – Appellant
Versus
Shahneela Nishat – Respondent
FIRST APPEAL No. - 111 of 2019 at Lucknow



Advocates:
Petitioner: Shafiq Mirza and Ali Akhtar Zaidi
Respondent: Mohd. Mustafizul Haq

Under Muslim Personal Law, a marriage can be dissolved by mutual agreement (mubara’at), which requires both parties' consent and may occur without judicial intervention.

Headnote:(A) Family Courts Act, 1984 - Section 19 - Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 - Section 2 - Appeal filed by husband to quash Family Court's order dismissing declaration of matrimonial status - Court found no endorsement of triple talaq given during non-menstrual periods nor evidence of reconciliation efforts - Reliance on Shayara Bano v. Union of India, (2017) 9 SCC 1 - Mutual agreement for divorce was acknowledged, with husband paying Rs.30,00,000/- to wife - Court endorsed mutual dissolution by declaring marriage dissolved. (Paras 4, 11, 12, 15)

(B) Divorce by Mutual Consent - Under Muslim Personal Law, a marriage can be dissolved by mutual agreement, known as mubara’at, which requires both parties' consent and can occur without judicial intervention. (Paras 8, 9)

(C) Family Court's Role - The Family Court should verify the mutuality and voluntariness of the divorce agreement and endorse it without extensive inquiry once satisfied. (Paras 9, 10)

Facts of the case:
The marriage between the parties was solemnized in 2002, with the husband alleging cruelty and filing for a declaration of matrimonial status after giving triple talaq. The Family Court dismissed the case, leading to the appeal.

Findings of Court:
The appeal was disposed of based on the mutual agreement, and the marriage was declared dissolved.

Issues: The main issues were the validity of the triple talaq and the acknowledgment of the mutual agreement for divorce.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that under Muslim law, mutual consent is sufficient for divorce, and the Family Court's endorsement is required only to formalize the status.

Result: The decree of divorce is granted, declaring the marriage dissolved.

JUDGMENT :

Vivek Chaudhary, Om Prakash Shukla, JJ.

(1) Heard Shri Ali Akhtar Zaidi, learned Counsel representing the appellant/husband and Shri Mohd. Mustafizul Haq, learned Counsel representing the respondent/wife.

(2) This appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 has been filed by the husband/appellant, seeking to quash the judgment and order dated 04.07.2019 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Lucknow, whereby Declaration Case No. 214 of 2019 filed by the husband/appellant for declaration of matrimonial status of the parties has been dismissed at the admission stage.

(3) Facts of the case are that the marriage between the appellant and the respondent was solemnized on 12.01.2002 in accordance with Islamic Rites and Rituals. It was the case of the appellant that after marriage, the behaviour of his wife was not good as his wife was having affair with a police officer, on account of which his wife visited her parental house frequently. With the connivance of the said police officer, his wife had lodged frivolous complaint against him and her behaviour became cruel. Ultimately, on 02.07.2018, she went to parental home and since then, she is living there only. Despite efforts made by him for reconciliation, settlement between them was not arrived and ultimately he gave triple talaq to his wife in accordance with muslim law. In this background, the appellant had instituted the declaration case, bearing No. 214 of 2019, seeking to declare the matrimonial status of the parties, before the Family Court, Lucknow.

(4) The learned Family Court, Lucknow, heard the aforesaid declaration case at admission stage and has returned a finding that though the husband claimed to have given triple talaq in the month of March, April and May, but there was neither any endorsement to the fact that first, second and third talaq were given by the husband during the non- menstrual period of the wife nor there was any endorsement to the fact that any effort for reconciliation preceded Talaq. By recording these findings and placing reliance upon the judgment of the Apex Court rendered in Shayara Bano v. Union of India, (2017) 9 SCC 1, the learned Family Court has dismissed the declaration case vide judgment and order dated 04.07.2019 at the admission stage, which is assailed in the present appeal.

(5) During the hearing of the present appeal, learned Counsels for the parties have drawn attention to Annexure SSA-1 of the second supplementary affidavit, which is a Mubara’at (mutual agreement) dated 15.06.2024 entered into between the parties. This mutual agreement was also filed in the proceedings under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. initiated by the respondent (wife), bearing Case No. 358 of 2018. The agreement provides that both parties will withdraw all pending cases between them, and the marriage shall be dissolved by mutual consent, subject to the payment of Rs.30,00,000/- (Rupees Thirty Lakhs) by the husband to the wife in three installments. Learned Counsel for the appellant submits that both the parties are living separately and the husband has already paid the entire sum of Rs.30,00,000/- in three installments and requests that the present appeal be disposed of in terms of the mutual agreement, thereby dissolve the marriage between the parties by consent.

(6) Mohd. Mustafizul Haq, learned Counsel representing the respondent/wife does not dispute the aforesaid mutual agreement dated 15.06.2024 and states that Rs.30,00,000/- has been paid to the wife by the husband/appellant in three installments and the respondent has no objection to declare the marriage of the parties dissolve in terms of the mutual agreement dated 15.06.2024.

(7) Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, governs marriage and divorce for Muslims in India. Section 2 of the Act explicitly recognizes various forms of divorce, including Mubara’at, Khula, Talaq, and Faskh.

(8) Under Shariyat Law, a marriage can be dissolved by mutual agreement between the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top