SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 2668

HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
Vaibhav Jain – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. And Another – Respondent


Advocates:
Petitioner: Rama Shankar Mishra
Respondent: G.A. and Pandey Balkrishna

JUDGMENT :

Manju Rani Chauhan, J.

1. Heard Mr. Rama Shankar Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Amrendra Nath Singh, Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Pandey Balkrishna, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

2. The present application has been filed assailing the order dated 05.09.2024 vide which the discharge application has been rejected as well as the entire proceedings of the case.

3. Brief facts of the case are that an FIR was lodged on 15.01.2022 by the opposite party no.2-Sonal Jain against four persons including the applicant with the allegations that marriage of opposite party no.2 was solemnized with Vishal Jain (brother of the applicant) according to Hindu Rites and Rituals on 21.11.2019. It is further alleged that the father of opposite party no.2 had given gifts and dowry as per his capacity, details about which have been mentioned in the FIR. All the named accused being Vishal Jain - husband, Ashok Jain - father-in-law, Kiran Jain - mother-in-law as well as the devar Vaibhav Jain/applicant, mentally and physically tortured the opposite party no.2 raising additional dowry demand. Details about se

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top