SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 15982

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
SURENDRA KOLI – Appellant
Versus
C.B.I. – Respondent


Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:199091-DB

Reserved

Index

In

Nithari Judgement

CAPITAL CASE No. - 2 of 2019

With

CAPITAL REFERENCE No. 1 of 2019

Surendra Koli ……..Appellant

Versus

State through Central Bureau of Investigation …….Respondent

Counsels for Appellant:- Sri Yug Mohit Chaudhary assisted

by Ms. Payoshi Roy and Sri Siddhartha Sharma, Ms. Mary

Punch (Sheeba Jose) and Sri Mohd. Kalim.

Counsels for Respondent:- A.G.A., Sri Amit Mishra, Sri Gyan

Prakash, Sri Jitendra Prasad Mishra and Sri Sanjay Kumar

Yadav.

Sl. No.

Particulars

Para No.

1.

The Nithari incident

3-15

2.

Disappearance of victim J

16-19

3.

Documentary evidence of prosecution

20

4.

5.

Oral evidence of prosecution

Statement of accused u/s 313 Cr.P.C.

21

22-23

6.

7.

Chronology of events

Circumstances relied upon by the court of

Sessions to hold the accused guilty

24

25-

8.

Arguments in support of appeal

26-64

9.

Arguments on behalf of the prosecution (CBI)

65-70

10.

Issues arising in the appeal

71-73

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

Law on recovery u/s 27 of the Indian Evidence

Act, 1872.

Analysis of evidence on the aspect of arrest of

accused,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top