2023 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 15454
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
ANIL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
BAIL/57536/2022
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 57536
of 2022
Applicant :- Anil Singh
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Janardan Yadav
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
Heard Sri Janardan Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant and
Sri Varun Kumar Agnihotri, learned brief holder for the State-
respondent.
The instant application has been filed seeking release of the
applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 245 of 2019, under
Sections 147, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 416 IPC, Police Station-
Saraimeer, District Azamgarh, during pendency of the trial in
the court below.
According to the FIR the applicant is the broker of land and
Anil Singh and co-accused Ram Awadh Yadav received
photocopy of Voter ID Card of the informant and subsequently
it revealed to the informant that on his name a fake bank
account was opened and on the basis of his property Rs.8/- lacs
loan from the bank was disbursed.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that entire allegations
made against the applicant are totally false and baseless and
there is no evidence on record which can show that applicant
along with other co-accused persons opened the bank account
of the informant and took the loan amount of Rs.8/- lacs against
the property of the informant. He further submits that only
allegation against the applicant is that Anil Singh and co-
accused Ram Awadh Yadav received a photocopy of the Voter
ID Card of the informant and except this nothing on record
against the applicant and on the basis of such allegation
applicant implicated in the present matter. He further submitted
that Field Officer Hari Shankar Prasad has been released on
anticipatory bail and the bail application of Branch Manager
has been allowed by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order
dated 04.01.2023 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.
57411 of 2022. He next submits that the applicant is not named
in the F.I.R. he is in jail since 19.11.2022.
Per contra, learned AGA although opposed the prayer for bail
but could not dispute the fact that except the allegation that the
applicant along with co-accused Ram Awadh Yadav received a
photocopy of the Voter ID Card of the informant, there is no
other allegation against him and Bank Manager Ashok Anand
has already been enlarged on bail by this Court and Field
Officer of the Bank has been released on anticipatory bail.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
record of the case.
Although there is allegations that by playing fraud from the
loan account of the informant Rs.8/- lacs has been disbursed but
there is no allegation against the applicant either in the F.I.R. or
in the statement of witnesses that he either withdrew the loan
amount or the loan was disbursed in his favour and only
allegation against him is that he and co-accused Ram Awadh
received a photocopy of the Voter ID Card of the informant.
Further, co-accused Ashok Anand, the Bank Manger has already
been released on bail and co-accused Hari Shankar Prasad, the
Field Officer has been released on anticipatory bail, therefore,
considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact
that the applicant is not having any criminal history and he is in
the present matter are in jail since 19.11.2022, therefore, in my
view the applicant are entitled to be released on bail.
The instant bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant- Anil Singh be released on bail in the
aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties
each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court
concerned with the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the dates
fixed, unless his personal presence is exempted.
(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclos