SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 17244

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT ANJUMAN INTEZAMIA MASAJID VARANASI – Appellant
Versus
SMT. RAKHI SINGH AND 9 OTHERS – Respondent


Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:123171

RESERVED

A.F.R.

Court No. - 64

Case :- CIVIL REVISION No. - 101 of 2022

Revisionist :- Committee of Management, Anjuman Intezamia

Masajid, Varanasi

Opposite Party :- Smt. Rakhi Singh and others

Counsel for Revisionist :- Syed Ahmed Faizan,Sr. Advocate,

Zaheer Asghar

Counsel for Opposite Party :- Prabhash Pandey, Arya Suman

Pandey, Saurabh Tiwari, Vishnu Shankar Jain, Vineet Sankalp

Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J.

This is a defendant’s Civil Revision under Section 115 of the

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arising out of an order of Dr. Ajaya

Krishna Vishvesha, the District Judge of Varanasi, rejecting an

application by the defendant-revisionist under Order VII Rule 11 CPC

in Original Suit No.18 of 2022.

The reliefs claimed in the Suit

2.

The five plaintiff-respondents to this revision have instituted

Original Suit No.18 of 2022 against the State of Uttar Pradesh,

represented by the Chief Secretary, the District Magistrate, Varanasi,

the Commissioner of Police, Varanasi, the Committee of

Management, Anjuman Intezamia Masajid, Varanasi through its

Secretary, representing the Gyanvapi Mosque and the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top