ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
GOLU – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
BAIL/41173/2022
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 41173
of 2022
Applicant :- Golu
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Counsel for Applicant :- Indra Raj
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Neha Gupta,Ravindra
Kumar Pandey
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
1. Heard Sri Deepak Kumar, Advocate, holding brief of Sri
Indra Raj, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Shashi Kant
Rai, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Ravindra Kumar Pandey,
learned counsel for informant and Dr. S.B. Maurya, leaned
AGA-I for the State.
2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the
applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 242 if 2022, under Sections
377, 511 IPC & Section 18 Protection of Children From Sexual
Offenes (POCSO) Act, 2012, police station - New Agra, District
- Agra during pendency of the trial in the court below.
3. As per the FIR the allegation against the applicant is that he
forcefully made a sex against nature with a 8-years old boy who
was his nephew in relation.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant
has been falsely implicated in the present matter due to property
dispute between the parties. He never committed the alleged
offence.
5. He next submitted that only allegation against applicant is
that he tried to make forceful anal intercourse against the boy of
8-years old against his wish. He next submitted that applicant is
having no previous criminal history and he is in jail since
28.7.2022 and considering his long incarceration, he maybe
released on bail.
6. Per contra, learned AGA and learned counsel for opposite
party no. 2 opposed the prayer for bail and submits that
applicant committed heinous offence. He tried to make forceful
anal intercourse with a 8-years old boy against nature and there
is medical report of the victim which shows, he sustained injury
in his anal area therefore he is not entitled to be released on
bail.
7. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
record of the case.
8. Applicant is the Uncle of the victim, a 8-years old boy, in
relation and as per allegation he did forceful anal intercourse
with the boy and as per medical report of the victim tear was
present at 12' O Clock position on the anus. In statement
recorded under Section 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. the victim
specifically stated that his Uncle (applicant) tried to make
unnatural sexual intercourse with him and suddenly his mother
arrived and mother also stated that applicant was found on spot
while he was trying to commit instant offence.
9. Therefore, considering allegation and relationship of
applicant with victim, applicant is not entitled to be released on
bail.
10. The bail application is accordingly rejected.
Order Date :- 2.1.2023
S.K.S.
Digitally signed by :-
SUNIL KUMAR SINGH
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.