ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
DEEPAK VERMA
PRADEEP – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
BAIL/1880/2023
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1880 of
2023
Applicant :- Pradeep
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Anand Pati Tiwari
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Heard Sri Anand Pati Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri
Ram Adhar Ram, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the
record.
The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release
the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 250 of 2020, registered
under Sections 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities
(Prevention) Act, Police Station Arniya, District Bulandshahr
during pendency of the trial.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that two cases are
shown in the gang chart on that account provisions of Gangster Act
has been imposed. He further submitted that the applicant is
innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to
ulterior motive. The applicant has been granted bail in the cases
shown in the gang chart which is annexed as Annexure 2 to the
affidavit. The applicant has two other cases except the cases shown
in the gang chart in which he has been granted bail, copy of bail
orders have been annexed as Annexure 3 to the affidavit. Co-
accused, namely, Sachin Kumar and Ravi Kumar have been
granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated
18.02.2021 and 09.08.2021 respectively, and the applicant's case is
identical to the co-accused, hence, the applicant is also entitled for
bail on the ground of same footing. The applicant neither involved
in any anti social activities nor a leader of any gang. The applicant
is languishing in jail since 24.02.2021. In case, the applicant is
released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and co-
operate in trial.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.
Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case,
submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view
the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without
expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and the law laid
down by the Apex Court in Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. C.B.I. &
Another, S.L.P.(Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021, the Court is of the view
that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application
is allowed.
Let the applicant, Pradeep, who is involved in the aforesaid case
crime, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and
two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court
concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing
the release order, the sureties be verified.
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by
intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation
or trial.
2. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without
seeking any adjournment.
3. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or
commission of any crime after being released on bail.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a
ground for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 10.2.2023
Nitin Verma
Digitally signed by :-
NITIN KUMAR VERMA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.