SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 18316

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Minor 'X' Through His Guardian/Father – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


A.F.R.

Reserved on 03.01.2023

Delivered on 09.02.2023

Court No. - 85

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S

438 CR.P.C. No. - 11542 of 2022

Applicant :- Minor 'X' Through His Guardian/Father, District Prayagraj

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Pathak,Shashank Shekhar Tiwari

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Prem Shankar Pandey

Hon'ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma,J.

1. It appears that name of the applicant-juvenile has been disclosed in

the memo of revision. This fault from the side of applicant escaped

detection by the Registry. The concerned section of Registry is directed

to remove the name of the applicant-minor from the title of the revision

as fed and shown in the data on official website and represent him as

"Minor 'X' Through His Guardian/Father, District Prayagraj."

2. Heard Sri Rakesh Pathak, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri

O.P. Mishra, learned AGA for the State on the point of maintainability

of this anticipatory bail application.

3. The present application has been filed on behalf of minor ‘X’

through his guardian/father seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R./Case

Crime No. 0362 of 2022, under Sections 307,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top