ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Minor 'X' Through His Guardian/Father – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
A.F.R.
Reserved on 03.01.2023
Delivered on 09.02.2023
Court No. - 85
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S
438 CR.P.C. No. - 11542 of 2022
Applicant :- Minor 'X' Through His Guardian/Father, District Prayagraj
Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another
Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Pathak,Shashank Shekhar Tiwari
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Prem Shankar Pandey
Hon'ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma,J.
1. It appears that name of the applicant-juvenile has been disclosed in
the memo of revision. This fault from the side of applicant escaped
detection by the Registry. The concerned section of Registry is directed
to remove the name of the applicant-minor from the title of the revision
as fed and shown in the data on official website and represent him as
"Minor 'X' Through His Guardian/Father, District Prayagraj."
2. Heard Sri Rakesh Pathak, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri
O.P. Mishra, learned AGA for the State on the point of maintainability
of this anticipatory bail application.
3. The present application has been filed on behalf of minor ‘X’
through his guardian/father seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R./Case
Crime No. 0362 of 2022, under Sections 307,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.