ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
MOHAMMAD ALAM – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Court No. - 43
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4032 of 2023
Petitioner :- Mohammad Alam
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Yadav
Counsel for Respondent :- CSC
Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.
Heard Shri Vinod Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner
and Shri Abhineet Jaiswal, learned Standing Counsel for the State-
respondents.
The instant writ petition has been filed with the prayer for
mandamus commanding respondent no. 2, Tehsildar, Tehsil
Phoolpur, district Azamgarh to consider and decide Mutation Case
No. 1926 of 2022 (Computerized Case No. T202215060301926)
under section 35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Mohammad Alam
and others vs Nazrulhasan) village Manerkala, Paragan Mahul
Tehsil Phoolpur, district Azamgarh within stipulated period.
Learned Standing Counsel has no serious objection to the prayer
made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, evidence
available on record and having heard the argument advanced by
learned counsel for the parties, respondent No. 2, Tehsildar is
directed to decide the aforesaid case, in accordance with law,
expeditiously, preferably within
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.