ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
ASHISH – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
BAIL/58714/2022
Fact of the Case:
The applicant, Ashish, was arrested and charged with robbery and theft under Sections 392 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. He was not named in the FIR, and no recovery was made from his possession. He claimed to be innocent and falsely implicated.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the applicant had been in jail since September 26, 2022, and that there was no likelihood of him fleeing or tampering with witnesses. The court also considered the nature of the accusations and the severity of the punishment in the event of conviction.
Issues: Whether the applicant should be granted bail.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the applicant was entitled to bail, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, including the lack of a criminal record, the nature of the accusations, and the severity of the punishment.
Final Decision: The court allowed the applicant's bail application and ordered his release on bail subject to certain conditions.
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 58714
of 2022
Applicant :- Ashish
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Raj Kumar Sharma,Sunil Kumar
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Syed Waiz Mian,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the
State and perused the record of the present bail application.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant-
Ashish with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime
No.475 of 2022, under Sections 392, 411 I.P.C., Police Station
Rasoolabad, District Kanpur Dehat.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that applicant
has been falsely implicated in the present case; applicant is
innocent person; he is not nominated in the F.I.R.; no recovery
has been made from the possession of the applicant; his name
has been surfaced during the course of investigation; he has not
committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R.; there is no
public or independent witness; learned counsel for the applicant
has further submitted that there is no possibility of fleeing away
from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and in
case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, the applicant shall not
misuse the liberty of bail. The applicant is in jail since
26.09.2022, hence, he is entitled to bail.
Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed bail.
Having heard learned counsel for both the parties, gone through
the material placed on record and considering the nature of
accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of
conviction but without commenting on the merits of the case, a
case for bail is made out, accordingly allowed.
Let the applicant, Ashish, involved in above mentioned case
crime number be released on bail on his executing a personal
bond and two reliable sureties each in the like amount to the
satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following
conditions:
(i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence.
(ii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity.
(iii) The applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the
prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the investigation of the
trial.
(iv) The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date
fixed by the trial court unless his personal appearance is
exempted through counsel by the court concerned.
In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the
court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail.
Order Date :- 3.1.2023
HR
Digitally signed by :-
HEMANT RANJAN
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.