SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 17615

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
JITENDRA KUMAR PATHAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS – Respondent


Court No. - 52

Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1102 of

2023

Petitioner :- Jitendra Kumar Pathak

Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others

Counsel for Petitioner :- Sandeep Kumar Dubey

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sudhir Bharti

Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.

1. Though a prayer has been made in the present petition that

Case No.60 of 2012 under Section 122-B of the U.P. Zamindari

Abolition & Land Reforms Act-1950 (wrongly mentioned as

"U.P. Land Revenue Code") be directed to be decided

expeditiously, I find that the aforesaid case was already decided

on 31.03.2012 and, thereafter, a recall application has been filed

by Chandramani Pathak i.e. respondent no.4 on 15.06.2012

which is pending.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner also admits that it is not an

original case but the restoration application which is pending

for the last more than ten years.

3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, the present

petition in the nature of public interest litigation is being

disposed off directing the court concerned to consider the recall

application filed by Chandramani Pathak i.e. respondent no.4

on 15.06.2012 in Case No.60 of 2012 within a period

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top