SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 17638

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
MUNNILAL SHARMA AND 2 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Court No. - 80

Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 10262 of 2022

Appellant :- Munnilal Sharma And 2 Others

Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Appellant :- M.S. Chauhan,Shivkumari Chauhan

Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

Despite service of notice on opposite party no.2, but no one has

put in appearance on behalf of opposite party no.2 to oppose this

appeal.

Heard learned counsel for the appellant; learned AGA for opposite

party no.1 perused the material placed on record.

Supplementary-affidavit filed today is taken on record.

The present criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) Scheduled

Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been

filed by the appellant to set aside the impugned order dated

22.11.2022 whereby the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Ballia, has

rejected the bail application of the appellant moved by him in Case

Crime No. 275 of 2022, under Sections 147, 323, 504, 308 IPC

and Section 3(1)(da), 3(2) (Va) SC/ST Act, Police Station -

Sahatwar, District Ballia,

The applicants and four co-accused persons were implicated in this

case on the allegation of making attempt to commit culpable

homicide not amounting to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top