2023 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 18696
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
,
JAI SHIV KHOKA VYAAPAR ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
WRIC/23398/2022
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23398 of 2022
Petitioner :- Jai Shiv Khoka Vyaapar Association
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Akhilesh Chandra Shukla,Dhawan
Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Pankaj Srivastava
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
Hon'ble Nand Prabha Shukla,J.
Heard Sri Akhilesh Chandra Shukla, learned counsel for the
petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and
Sri Pankaj Srivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of
Nagar Nigam.
Supplementary counter affidavit on behalf of Nagar Nigam,
Meerut, in compliance of the order dated 19.1.2023, filed today, is
taken on record.
Sri Akhilesh Chandra Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that no reply to the said affidavit is required on the part of
the petitioner. We, therefore, proceed to hear the matter on merits.
In the supplementary counter affidavit filed today, a categorical
statement has been made that on 04.02.2023, total 96 street
vendors were allotted space from Shop No. 1 to 96 in Garh Road
Vending Zone, in the platform which can accommodate 150 street
vendors. The said exercise was undertaken in the presence of
District Administration, Police Administration, Senior Officers and
Staff of the Nagar Nigam, Meerut as also the leaders of the
petitioner-association and street vendors. The name of each vendor
was called from the public address system and he was informed of
his platform number, which was publicly announced on the mike,
which included the name of 96 members of the petitioners'
association.
It is also stated in paragraph '6' of the said affidavit that on
03.02.2023 at 11.00 A.M. in the Town Hall near Ghantaghar by a
lottery, the places in vending zone were allotted in favour of street
vendors with prior information to the concerned street vendors and
the members of petitioners' association. The President of the
petitioners' association was present in the Town Hall and stated
that he will not participate in the proceeding of allotment of spaces
to the street vendors. Complete videography of the said meeting
was done which can be produced whenever needed by this Court.
It is also stated in paragraph '8' of the affidavit filed today that the
office bearers and leaders of the petitioners' association refused
and prevented the street vendors to take possession raising a new
ground that Nagar Nigam is uprooting existing vendors.
The leaders of the petitioner-association had refused to take
possession and prevented the street vendors to take possession of
the allotted space. The office bearers of the petitioner-association,
thus, are changing their stand from time to time in order to
sabotage sincere efforts made by the Nagar Nigam, Meerut for
accommodation of the street vendors, removed from Plot No. 6041
belonging to Nagar Nigam, Meerut.
It is also stated in the affidavit filed today that in compliance of
Section 3(1) of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and
Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014 (hereinafter referred to
'the Act 2014), 154 spots have been identified in the entire limits
of Nagar Nigam as vending zones and 18250 street vendors were
identified by M/s. Yug Associates who had been entrusted with the
responsibility of identifying street vendors. At present, online
registration of street vendors is in process and 29285 street
vendors have got themselves registered online and five vending
zones have already been constructed/completed. The allotment
letters provided to 96 street vendors have been collectively filed as
Annexure-'5' from page '122' to '128'. The copy of the receipts of
the service of the allotment letters to individual street vendors have
also been appended as Annexure-'6' to the affidavit filed today.
It is specifically stated that no street vendor was ever allotted any
space inside the Plot No. 6041, which is the property of Nagar
Nigam, Me