HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J. and Hon'ble Donadi Ramesh,J.
Smt Anchal Goyal – Appellant
Versus
Parag Goyal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Donadi Ramesh, J.
1. Heard Sri Kiran Kumar Arora, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Aditya Bhushan Singhal, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. Present appeal has been filed under Section 19 of the Family Court Act, 1984 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’), arising from order dated4.10.2024 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Saharanpur on Application Paper No. 39A/1-3, filed [under Order VI Rule 17 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘CPC’)], by the present appellant in Original Suit No. 323 of 2022 (Parag Goyal Vs. Smt. Anchal Goyal), whereby the learned court below has dismissed the amendment application filed by the present appellant, seeking to introduce the following two paragraphs as paragraph nos. 54-A and 54B, to her written statement.

3. At the outset, a preliminary objection has been raised by learned counsel for the respondent that the present appeal is not maintainable under Section19 of the Act. For ready reference, Section 19 of the Act to the extent it is relevant to the present proceeding, reads as below:
“19. Appeal – (1) Save as provided in sub-section (2) and notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Civ
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.