SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 563

HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Sunilyadav – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Petitioner: Surendra Mohan Mishra
Respondent: G.A.

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

2. The instant Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant in Case Crime No.266 of 2023, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C. & Section 12 of Passport Act , Police Station- Uruwa Bazar, District Gorakhpur.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Allegation against the applicant is that he in place of his earlier passport renewed, got new passport using different title. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant would cooperate in the investigation.

4. Considered the argument raised by learned counsel for the applicant. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the applicant is, hereby, refused.

5. However, in view of judgment passed in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar , (2014) 8 SCC 273 , wherein law has been laid down for arresting a person, which are being reproduced hereinbelow:-

"Our endeavour in this judgment is to ensure that police officers do not arrest accused unnecessarily and Magistrate do not a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top