HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
Neeraj Jain @ Banty Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
1. Heard Ms. Shakti Dubey, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Kunjesh Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Shatruhan Yadav, learned AGA for the State-respondent.
2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 1086 of 2024, under Sections 111, 318, 338, 336(3), 61(2), 340(2), 352, 351(3) BNS and 3/21 B.U.D.S. Act, Police Station- Kotwali Lalitpur, District- Lalitpur, during pendency of the trial in the court below.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant was not named in the FIR and during investigation, he has been made accused in the present matter on the ground that he was also agent of the LUCC company, which duped the common public. He further submitted that as per allegation, even after receiving deposits from the investor through its agents, LUCC company did not repay the amount. It is next submitted, as applicant is agent of the company, therefore, he cannot be held liable if subsequently company failed to return the maturity amount to its investor.
4. She further submitted that however, applicant was not having any previous criminal history but subsequent to t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.