Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material brought on record.

2. This application under Section - 482 Cr.P.C . has been preferred for quashing of the entire proceedings, including summoning order dated 01.04.2024, of Complaint Case No. 869 of 2023 (Rajendra Prasad Vs. Shanti Devi and Others), under Sections - 419, 420 I.P.C., Police Station - Rasra, District - Ballia, pending in the Court of Additional Civil Judge (J.D.)/Judicial Magistrate, Rasra, Ballia

3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that no prima facie case is made out against applicants. The opposite party no.2 has lodged impugned complaint making false and baseless allegations. It was stated that regarding disputed property, two declaratory suits are pending before the court of Sub- Divisional Magistrate and in those cases it is yet to be decided that who is owner of the disputed property. It is further submitted that in the complaint, the opposite party no.2 has alleged that applicants have got executed sale deed by way of impersonation showing the same to be executed by Achchey