ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
VISHU – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Court No. - 43
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30595
of 2022
Applicant :- Vishu
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Counsel for Applicant :- Mohit Kumar Singh,Sujata
Choudhary
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Birla,J.
Heard Ms. Sujata Chaudhary, learned counsel for the applicant
and Sri Ratan Singh, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.
Second supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
Present bail application has been filed on behalf of applicant
seeking his bail in connection with Case Crime No. 135 of
2022, u/s 328, 376(3) IPC and Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, P.S.
Civil Line, District Meerut.
By drawing attention to the statement of the victim recorded as
PW-1 it is submitted that she has not supported the prosecution
version and she stated in categorical terms that no rape was
committed upon her and the first information report was lodged
because of some minor dispute in the coaching institute and for
this reason out of anger and instigation of other person the first
information report was lodged. Attention was further drawn to
the statement of PW-2, father of the victim, which is also to the
same effect. Submission
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.