SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 7834

COURT No.2 ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH: NEW DELHI 10. OA 1148/2023 WITH MA 1761/2023 Ex Hav Birbal Singh sin 988 Applicant VERSUS Union of India and Ors. .... Respondents For Applicant : Mr. Bikrama Sah, Advocate For Respondents: Maj Sridhar J, OIC Legal Cell CORAM HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE ANJANA MISHRA, MEMBER oO HON’BLE LT GEN P. M. HARIZ, MEMBER (A) ORDER 03.05.2023 MA 1761/2023 Keeping in view the averments made in _ this application and finding the same to be bona fide, in the light of the decision in Union of India and others Vs. Tarsem Singh (2008) 8 SCC 648, the instant application is allowed condoning the delay in filing the OA. MA stands disposed of. OA 1148/2023 Invoking the jurisdiction of this Tribunal under Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, the applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:- (a) Direct respondents to re-calculate the pension and other terminal benefits after taking into OA 1148/2023 WITH MA 1761/2023 Ex Hav Birbal Singh2 account the benefit of NOTIONAL INCREMENT as on 30.06.2020. (b) Direct respondents to grant interest @ 12% on the arrears of pension and other terminal benefits to which the applicant is geld entit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top