COURT No.2 ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH: NEW DELHI 10. OA 1148/2023 WITH MA 1761/2023 Ex Hav Birbal Singh sin 988 Applicant VERSUS Union of India and Ors. .... Respondents For Applicant : Mr. Bikrama Sah, Advocate For Respondents: Maj Sridhar J, OIC Legal Cell CORAM HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE ANJANA MISHRA, MEMBER oO HON’BLE LT GEN P. M. HARIZ, MEMBER (A) ORDER 03.05.2023 MA 1761/2023 Keeping in view the averments made in _ this application and finding the same to be bona fide, in the light of the decision in Union of India and others Vs. Tarsem Singh (2008) 8 SCC 648, the instant application is allowed condoning the delay in filing the OA. MA stands disposed of. OA 1148/2023 Invoking the jurisdiction of this Tribunal under Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, the applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:- (a) Direct respondents to re-calculate the pension and other terminal benefits after taking into OA 1148/2023 WITH MA 1761/2023 Ex Hav Birbal Singh2 account the benefit of NOTIONAL INCREMENT as on 30.06.2020. (b) Direct respondents to grant interest @ 12% on the arrears of pension and other terminal benefits to which the applicant is geld entit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.