SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 5678

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
DHEERAJ PASWAN AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
BAIL/57947/2022



Accused is entitled to bail if there is no incriminating material recovered from him and he is not a flight risk.

Headnote:

BAIL - U.P. PREVENTION OF COW SLAUGHTER ACT - SECTION 3/5A/8 - NO COW MEAT RECOVERED - LIVE STOCKS RECOVERED - APPLICANTS ARE AGRICULTURISTS - NO CRIMINAL HISTORY - NOT A FLIGHT RISK - BAIL GRANTED

Fact of the Case:

The applicants were arrested and charged under Sections 3/5A/8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The prosecution alleged that the applicants were involved in cow slaughter. However, no cow meat was recovered from the applicants. Two live stocks were recovered from the applicants, who claimed to be agriculturists who use the live stocks in their agricultural activities. The applicants had no criminal history apart from this case and were not a flight risk.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the applicants were entitled to bail as there was no cow meat recovered from them and they were not a flight risk. The court also noted that the applicants were agriculturists who use the live stocks in their agricultural activities and had no criminal history apart from this case.

Issues: Whether the applicants were entitled to bail under Sections 3/5A/8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the applicants were entitled to bail as there was no cow meat recovered from them and they were not a flight risk. The court also noted that the applicants were agriculturists who use the live stocks in their agricultural activities and had no criminal history apart from this case.

Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application and directed that the applicants be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court below.

Court No. - 74

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 57947 of

2022

Applicant :- Dhanraj Paswan And Another

Opposite Party :- State of U.P.

Counsel for Applicant :- Girish Kumar Gupta,Santosh Kumar

Sharma

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.

By means of the the bail application the

applicants have prayed to be enlarged on

bail in Case Crime No. 208 of 2022 at

Police Station- Chakiya, District- Chandauli

under Sections 3/5A/8 U.P. Prevention of

Cow Slaughter Act. The applicants are in

jail since 16.11.2022.

The bail application of the applicants was

rejected by the learned trial court on

25.11.2022.

The following arguments made by Shri

Santosh Kumar Sharma learned counsel on

behalf of the applicants, which could not

be satisfactorily refuted by Shri

Markandey Singh, learned AGA from the

record, entitle the applicants for grant of

bail:

(1). No cow meat has been recovered from

the applicants.

(2). Two live stocks were recovered from

the applicants.

(2). The applicants are an agriculturist who

use the live stocks in their agricultural

activities.

(4). The applicants do not have any

criminal history apart from this case.

(5). The applicants are not a flight risk.

The applicants being a law abiding citizen

have always cooperated with the

investigation and undertake to cooperate

with the court proceedings. There is no

possibility of his influencing witnesses,

tampering with the evidence or

reoffending.

In the light of the preceding discussion and

without making any observations on the

merits of the case, the bail application is

allowed.

Let the applicants- Dhanraj Paswan and

Jaiprakash Paswan be released on bail in

the aforesaid case crime number, on

furnishing a personal bond and two

sureties each in the like amount to the

satisfaction of the court below. The

following conditions be imposed in the

interest of justice:-

(i) The applicant will not tamper with the

evidence or influence any witness during

the trial.

(ii) The applicant will appear before the

trial court on the date fixed, unless

personal presence is exempted.

Computer section is directed to correct the

cause title as depicted in the memo of bail

application.

Order Date :- 11.1.2023

Pravin

Digitally signed by :-

PRAVIN VERMA

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top