ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
MAHBOOB EJAJ – Appellant
Versus
MOHD NAZIM – Respondent
A227/11945/2022
LANDLORD AND TENANT - STAY OF DECREE - UNREASONABLE CONDITION - RENT FIXED BY REVISIONAL COURT AS RS. 15,000/- PER MONTH AS A CONDITION FOR STAYING THE OPERATION OF THE DECREE DATED 12.4.2022 IS UNREASONABLE AND IS LIABLE TO BE QUASHED.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a tenant, challenged the order of the revisional court which stayed the operation of the decree passed by the trial court in a suit for damages filed by the respondent-landlord. The revisional court had imposed a condition that the petitioner-tenant deposit the entire decreetal amount and continue to pay Rs. 15,000/- per month as rent to the landlord-respondent during the revision.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the condition fixed by the revisional court was unreasonable in view of the fact that the petitioner was a tenant at the rate of Rs. 1,800/- per month and the damages awarded by the trial court was Rs. 6,000/- per month.
Issues: Whether the condition imposed by the revisional court on the petitioner-tenant to pay Rs. 15,000/- per month as a condition for staying the operation of the decree dated 12.4.2022 was reasonable.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the rent fixed by the revisional court as Rs. 15,000/- per month as a condition for staying the operation of the decree dated 12.4.2022 was unreasonable and is liable to be quashed.
Final Decision: The court quashed the order of the revisional court insofar as it directed the tenant-petitioner to pay rent at the rate of Rs. 15,000/- per month as a condition for staying the operation of the decree dated 12.4.2022. However, the court directed the tenant-petitioner to continue to pay Rs. 6,000/- per month as damages to the respondent-landlord and to pay the entire decreetal amount within two months from the date of the order.
Court No. - 38
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11945 of 2022
Petitioner :- Mahboob Ejaj
Respondent :- Mohd Nazim
Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhir Kumar Malviya,Syed Fahim Ahmed
Counsel for Respondent :- Anshuman Vidhu Chandra,Ram Adhin
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
The present petition has been filed challenging the order
dated 4.11.2022 passed by the Additional District Judge,
Court No. 14, District-Allahabad in S.C.C. Revision No. 64 of
2022 whereby the Revisional Court has stayed the
operation of the decree dated 12.4.2022 passed by the
Small Causes Court, Allahabad in Small Cause Case No. 17
of 2018 (Computer Case No. 16 of 2018) with the condition
that the petitioner-tenant deposits the entire decreetal
amount and continues to pay Rs. 15,000/- per month as
rent to the landlord-respondent during the revision.
The trial court vide its decree dated 12.4.2022 had
awarded damages of Rs. 6,000/- per month to the
respondent-landlord. The S.C.C. Suit was filed with the
averment that the petitioner was a tenant in the suit
property on a rent of Rs. 1,800/- per month.
It has been argued by the counsel for the petitioner that
the condition fixed by the revisional court is unreasonable
in view of the fact that the petitioner was a tenant at the
rate of Rs. 1,800/- per month and the damages awarded by
the trial court was Rs. 6,000/- per month.
Rebutting the argument of the counsel for the petitioner,
the counsel for the respondent has argued that the
condition imposed on the petitioner-tenant to pay Rs.
15,000/- per month is not unreasonable in view of the circle
rate of the area.
It would serve no purpose to keep the petition pending by
calling for a counter affidavit.
It is the admitted case of the respondent-landlord that the
petitioner was a tent in the suit property at the rate of Rs.
1,800/- per month. The trial court after decreeing the
S.C.C. Suit instituted by the landlord-respondent
determined damages at the rate of Rs. 6,000/- per month
to be paid by the petitioner-tenant to the respondent-
landlord till possession of the suit property is handed over
to the respondent-landlord.
In the circumstances, the rent fixed by the revisional court
as Rs. 15,000/- per month as a condition for staying the
operation of the decree dated 12.4.2022 is unreasonable
and is liable to be quashed.
The order dated 4.11.2022 passed by the Additional
District Judge, Court No. 14, District-Allahabad so far as it
directs the tenant-petitioner to pay rent at the rate of Rs.
15,000/- per month as a condition for staying the operation
of the decree dated 12.4.2022 is hereby quashed.
However, the tenant-petitioner shall continue to pay Rs.
6,000/- per month as damages to the respondent-landlord
and shall also pay the entire decreetal amount within two
months from today and in any case by 5.3.2023.
Subject to compliance of the aforesaid condition, the
operation of the order dated 12.4.2022 passed by the
Small Causes Court, Allahabad shall remain stayed during
the pendency of S.C.C. Revision No. 64 of 2022.
It is further directed that the revisional court, i.e., the
Additional District Judge, Court No. 14, District-Allahabad
shall expeditiously decide S.C.C. Revision No. 64 of 2022
without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either
party.
With the aforesaid observations and directions, the petition
is allowed.
Order Date :- 3.1.2023
Anurag/-
Digitally signed by :-
ANURAG KUMAR VERMA
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.