SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(ALL) 8037

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RAUDAS AND 2 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Court No. - 72

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 27228 of 2022

Applicant :- Raudas And 2 Others

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Mithilesh Kumar Ojha

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma,J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned

A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for

quashing the summoning order dated 29.07.2022 in Complaint

Case No. 518 of 2922, (Sanjeev Kaushik Vs. Raudas and

others) under section 452, 323, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station

Anoop Shahar District-Bulandshahar pending in the Additional

Chief Judicial Magistrate Anoopshahar District- Bulandshahar.

At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicants has

submitted that the applicants relinquish the prayer for

quashment and wish to move bail application before the trial

court in view of the guidelines / observations given by Hon'ble

The Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central

Bureau of Investigation and another reported in ( 2021) 10 SCC

773 .

Learned A.G.A. has no objection.

Considering the above submissions and taking i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top