ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
NAZIM AND 3 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438
CR.P.C. No. - 9859 of 2022
Applicant :- Nazim And 3 Others
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Rahul Singh,A.K. Mishra
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for State and perused
the record.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicants that applicants are innocent
and have been falsely implicated in the present case. In this case, F.I.R. was
lodged under section 452, 323, 504, 307 IPC against the applicants but during
investigation offence under Section 307 IPC was not found to be made out and
charge sheet was submitted under Section 452, 323, 504, IPC. Applicants are
ready to appear before the court concerned and face the trial. Lastly, it is
submitted that the applicants are under apprehension of imminent arrest. In case,
the applicants are released on bail, they would not misuse the liberty of bail and
would cooperate with the trial.
On the other hand, learned AGA opposed the prayer of anticipatory bail and
urged that there is criminal history of one case against the applicants and aft
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.